Fateh Leadership Betrays the Memory of Abu Ammar and Abu Jihad

Bring Their Murderers to Justice

While the people all over the Arab world… Read more

Bring Their Murderers to Justice

While the people all over the Arab world are rising up against their U.S.-Israeli puppet regimes, the current Fateh leadership represented by the so-called Palestinian Authority (PA) is sending messages of support to these dictatorial regimes. The PA is also trying to prevent and suppress the Palestinian popular expression with the Tunisian and Egyptian uprising against these brutal dictatorships.

It is clear that this Palestinian leadership is serving US and Israeli interests and working against not only the Egyptian and Arab peoples’ aspirations but also against the liberation of the Palestinian people. Even the former Israeli Knesset member, Uri Avnery, figured it out when he stated: “The turmoil in Egypt was caused by economic factors: the rising cost of living, the poverty, the unemployment, the hopelessness of the educated young. But let there be no mistake: the underlying causes are far more profound. They can be summed up in one word: Palestine.”

Nonetheless, as recently exposed by the Palestine Papers(1), the present Fateh leadership is choosing to be on the side of the U.S. Empire and its allies, especially Israel, who are directly responsible for the war crimes against the Palestinian people. The PA is using the Egyptian regime’s tactics to suppress free speech; they are using “Dayton’s babies” (an elite PA security unit), that are financed by the U.S. and Canadian governments and trained by their intelligence services, in a desperate attempt to keep the Palestinian people chained.

This leadership is also betraying all the Palestinian martyrs especially Yasser Arafat (Abu Ammar) and Khalil Al-Wazir (Abu Jihad).

  1. Yasser Arafat: Over six years have passed since Arafat’s death, and the Fateh leadership has not pursued any serious attempt to expose the murder of Arafat. It has not asked the UN to investigate and expose his murderers, even though there have been signs from the beginning as to possible U.S.-Israeli complicity in his murder (see the article in COUNTERPUNCH “ The Revelations of Uri Dan”(2) “Dan claimed Sharon got approval from George Bush by phone early in 2004 to proceed with his plan after he told the US president he was no longer committed to “not” liquidating the Palestinian leader”.) There is a lot of evidence to support this view, including statements from his personal physician Ashraf al-Kurdi, Arafat’s former Cabinet secretary, Ahmad Abdel-Rahman, the former Fateh chairperson Farouq Qaddoumi (Abu Lutoff) and Bassam Abu Sharif, former senior advisor to Yasser Arafat. We tell Mahmoud Abbas and his Fateh leadership that silence on Arafat’s murder is complicity.
  2. Khalil Al-Wazir: Here is a chance for the Fateh leadership to demand justice for Abu Jihad and bring the former president of Tunisia, Zine El Abidin Ben Ali, one of the conspirators in his murder, to justice. But what does Mr. Abbas and his puppet regime do? He phones both Ben Ali and Mubarak to show solidarity with them. (For details of Ben Ali and his regime’s involvement in the murder of Abu Jihad, please see our letter(3) sent to the Tunisian Ambassador in Ottawa, or David Yallop’s book “To the Ends of the Earth” pages 224-226.)

On June 30, 2007 in our statement “What is Next for the Palestinian Secular Movement?(4)”, we warned of the dangers of the Abbas leadership regarding the Palestinian struggle and we called for his resignation.

We now call on:

  1. All the Palestinian people, and particularly Fateh members, cadres and leaders, to disassociate themselves from Abbas’ practices and policies and to topple him, and to declare loud and clear that Abbas does NOT represent the Palestinian people nor their cause.
  2. The UN to immediately appoint an objective tribunal to investigate the murder of Yasser Arafat headed by Richard Falk, U.N. Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights.
  3. The new Tunisian government to investigate the complicity of Ben Ali and his police and intelligence forces in the crime of murdering Abu Jihad, in addition to the many crimes they committed against the Tunisian people.
  4. All progressive forces to support the Tunisian, Egyptian, Palestinian, Yemeni and all other Arab peoples in their struggles for freedom, democracy and independence.

We demand justice for Abu Ammar and Abu Jihad and all the Palestinian and Arab Martyrs.


(1) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2011/1/23/introducing-the-palestine-papers
(2) https://www.counterpunch.org/2006/12/30/did-sharon-order-the-assassination-of-arafat/
(3) https://cpavancouver.org/2011/bring-ben-ali-and-his-police-and-intelligence-officers-to-justice/ 
(4) https://cpavancouver.org/2007/06/what-is-next-for-the-palestinian-secular-movement/  

Bring Ben Ali and his Police and Intelligence Officers to Justice

By Hanna Kawas. A letter to the Tunisian Ambassador to Canada regarding Read more

By Hanna Kawas. A letter to the Tunisian Ambassador to Canada regarding the Murder of Palestinian Leader Abu Jihad.

Tunisian Ambassador to Canada
Mouldi Sakri

Dear Ambassador:

We in the Canada Palestine Association, Vancouver, would like to request that your government charge the former president of Tunisia Zine El Abidin Ben Ali, his police and intelligence officers, with complicity in the murder of the beloved Palestinian leader Khalil El Wazir (Abu Jihad) in Tunis by an Israeli death squad on April 16, 1988. This is in addition to the long list of crimes he and his regime have committed against the Tunisian People.

David Yallop, the British investigative journalist, in his book “To the Ends of the Earth”, exposed the complicity of the U.S. and Tunisian governments in the murder of Abu Jihad.

Waiting to hear from you,
Sincerely Yours

Hanna Kawas
Chairperson, Canada Palestine Association


Following are some quotes from Yallop’s book (pages 224-226).

“When the Washington Post headlined its front page story on Jihad’s death with ‘High Backing Seen for Assassination’, it was absolutely correct but in view of the fact that it merely detailed the Israeli Cabinet decision to unleash its forces against Jihad, the Post got only part of the story.

The ‘High Backing’ also included the President of Tunis, Ben Ali, and the United States government, specifically the State Department.” Page 224

“On the night of April 15th, the American Cemetery close to the embassy was ablaze with light and activity. Normally in total darkness with a maximum of two Military Police patrolling, on this particular evening it was manned by thirty Military Police and a marine back-up. As part of the joint American/Israeli operation it had been agreed that the cemetery would serve as a fall-back position if the Israeli unit ran into heavy opposition.” Page 225

“Despite the fact that a neighbour to Jihad phoned the police at least twice, first to report the intruders, second to report hearing and seeing gun-fire in Jihad’s garden, the Tunisian police declined to send a car… By a curious coincidence on that evening virtually all members of the Tunisian police force had been taking part in a large exercise between nine in the evening and midnight. At midnight they had all been stood down and appear to have been on a mass collective meal break. The killing of Jihad took place at one-thirty in the morning. The Israeli unit were wearing Tunisian National Guard uniforms.” Pages 225-226

“The assassination of Jihad was not quite the flawless operation that the myth gives one to expect from the Israelis. The telephone jamming had failed and without the Tunisian complicity so would have the entire operation.”

“In the journey back to the Tunisian beach … one of the retreating units took a wrong turning and ripped the bottom out of the vehicle. Again without Tunisian connivance, the entire unit could so easily have been caught.” Page 226

Yallop concludes by saying “This, based on my research, is how the democratic nations of Israel and the United States, aided and abetted by Tunisia, disposed of the problem of Abu Jihad.” Page 226

Prof. David Noble: A Warrior for Truth and Justice

Statement by Canada Palestine Association and Voice of Palestine

December 29, 2010

We have Lost a Courageous and Honest Scholar: David Noble

We at the Canada Palestine Association-Vancouver and the Voice of Palestine-Canada express our deepest condolences to the wife and family of Professor David Noble who passed away on December 27, 2010.
Prof. Noble was a leading academic and principled activist of Jewish background who pioneered the struggle at York University against the influence of the pro-Israel lobby. His unflinching courage and honesty will be sadly missed. He was featured three times on Voice of Palestine Radio over the last few years and we are including the links below.

Once again, we are saddened by this unexpected and tragic news.

Hanna Kawas
Chair, Canada Palestine Association
Co-Host, Voice of Palestine
—————-
Statement by Canadian Arab Federation

Canadian Arab Federation

La Fédération Canado-Arabe

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 28, 2010

Canada loses David Noble, a great fighter for social and political justice.

With great sadness and deepest sorrow, we received the news of the passing away of Professor David Franklin Noble (July 22, 1945 – December 27, 2010).

Professor Noble was a critical historian of technology, science and education; a relentless crusader against the commercialization of higher education; a passionate champion of academic freedom; and a staunch opponent of discrimination. He last taught in the Division of Social Science, and the department of Social and Political Thought at York University in Toronto.

Professor Noble was an anti-Zionist Jew and a member of Independent Jewish Voices. In his critique of what he views as an academic-industrial system, Professor Noble has questioned Israel’s strategic role in Western institutions on a broad basis.

In late November 2004, Professor Noble handed out a flyer to his class entitled “The York University Foundation: The Tail That Wags the Dog” proposing that there was a connection between pro-Israeli influence on the York Foundation and the university administration’s treatment of vocal pro-Palestinian students on campus.

He later launched a $25 million libel suit at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against York University, Jewish, and Israeli organizations for defamation and conspiracy, accusing them of having improperly criticized his flyer as anti-semitic.

In April 2006 Professor Noble lodged a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC), stating that cancellation of classes during certain Jewish holidays constituted discrimination against non-Jewish students. OHRC investigation found York’s practice discriminatory and, before the issue made it to the Tribunal, York University agreed to stop the practice, starting in September 2009.

Throughout his life, whether at the personal or professional/academic level, Professor Noble was the embodiment of intellectual honesty, courage, and decency. Canada lost a truly noble person, both in name and in the essence of his character.

“Oh heart, if one should say to you that the soul perishes like the body, answer that the flower withers, but the seed remains.” Kahlil Gibran

We at the Canadian Arab Federation, Palestine House, Islamic Society of York Region and Canadian Shia Muslims Organization extend our deepest sympathy to his wife Sarah, his three children, his two brothers [and a sister], and stand with them during this difficult period.
——————-
See Globe and Mail article David Noble, academic and activist, dies at 65
——————-
Links to interviews and speeches on Voice of Palestine:

April 3, 2007

Highlights of the presentation by Prof. David Noble to the third annual Palestine Lives conference held at McMaster University in Hamilton on March 31st, 2007. The conference was sponsored by Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights SPHR, Hamilton. (28 minutes into the show)

VOP_Apr03_2007_8kbps.mp3 (8 kbps encoding, ~3.5MB)
VOP_Apr03_2007_16kbps.mp3 (16 kbps encoding, ~7.0MB)

Dec. 19, 2006
A live interview with Prof. David Noble on Voice of Palestine. (24 minutes into the show)

VOP_Dec19_2006_8kbps.mp3 (8 kbps encoding, ~3.5MB)
VOP_Dec19_2006_16kbps.mp3 (16 kbps encoding, ~7.0MB)

May 2, 2006
An interview with Professor David Noble from York University on Voice of Palestine, (26 minutes into the show)

VOP_May02_2006_8kbps.mp3 (8 kbps encoding, ~3.5MB)
VOP_May02_2006_16kbps.mp3 (16 kbps encoding, ~7.0MB)

The Bankruptcy of Canadian Zionists and Their Stooges

By: Hanna Kawas

It seems that the Canadian Zionists are not satisfied with… Read more

By: Hanna Kawas

It seems that the Canadian Zionists are not satisfied with the results of their pro-Israel “advocacy”, “rebranding”, “public affairs” and “hasbara” work. The Zionist paper, The Canadian Jewish News, recently reported the following: – “A sea (of) change is about to occur in the way Canadian Jewish community advocacy is conducted on both a regional and a national level. According to Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), the change is being led by the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy (CIJA), which is seeking to centralize control of the host of Jewish (read Israel – ed.) advocacy agencies it administers … and create a ‘single Jewish public affairs organization encompassing the national and regional level.’ The new entity would also work ‘in close co-operation with’ and ‘operate under’ the UIA (United Israel Appeal) Federations Canada system.” (1)
Since its founding in January 2004, CIJA “oversees and coordinates the advocacy work of Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), Canada-Israel Committee (CIC), Quebec-Israel Committee (QIC), National Jewish Campus Life (NJCL) and University Outreach Committee (UOC)”, effectively controlling all these groups both politically and financially. Its declared objective is to “ensure our voice is heard where it counts – in government, media and on campus.” (2)

It is a sad fact that Canadian Zionists have always been successful in not just being heard by various levels of Canadian government and media but also using these institutions as forums to protect Israel (a foreign power) and it colonialist apartheid project. So CIJA is not worried about the provincial and federal governments nor the main stream media (our website is full of examples of their defence of, and complicity in, Israeli atrocities and war crimes). However, what they are really worried about is their faltering image on campuses and among the Canadian public at large; hence, the “sea (of) change” to “centralize control” for Israel advocacy in Canada.

Four recent examples show the moral bankruptcy of the Zionists and their stooges.

• The CJC response (3) to KAIROS Palestine’s policy paper “A Moment of Truth” (4) is callous, inhumane, supremacist and full of historic distortions and fallacies. It is also a slap in the face of all Christians who support peace with justice, especially the Palestinian Christians (the first Christians and the Guardians of the holy places), who are trying to reach out to the world with their cry of hope, justice and peace.

• On Nov. 7, 2010, the so-called “Inter-parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism” held the Ottawa Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism. Shockingly, the invitations were issued as well “On behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry for Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism” and stated that the conference was “working in cooperation with the Canadian Government”. Not shockingly, they were signed by Jason Kenney and Irwin Cotler. The Governor General of Canada, the Prime Minster and the Liberal leader all rushed to both attend and address this conference. The objective of the conference was to shield Israel from criticism and accordingly limit freedom of speech in Canada and elsewhere, and was trying to set the stage to criminalize criticism of Israel. If and when these objectives are not met, then the “Anti-Semitism” card is being used to try to scare pro-Palestinian activists and silence their solidarity work by harassing and threatening them. In his speech to the conference Stephen Harper used the same words set out by leading Israeli propagandists(5), when he stated “Demonization, double standards, delegitimization, the three D’s, it is the responsibility of us all to stand up to them”. The PM also showed his true face by showing the extent to which he will go to support Israel right or wrong: “But, as long as I am Prime Minister, whether it is at the UN or the Francophonie or anywhere else, Canada will take that stand, whatever the cost (my emphasis-ed.)” (6). Because of this fanatical and unconditional support for Israel, Canada lost a seat at the UN Security Council and a free military base on UAE soil (that should not have been there in the first place). We did not see Israel offering a free base for the Canadian military instead. Clearly, the PM and his government are showing a clear disregard for decency, humanity and the strategic interests of the Canadian people. Which national anthem are they singing: O Canada or O Israel??

• At the University of British Columbia (UBC), in Vancouver, the Israel Awareness Club (IAC) and their “friends” tried to block a humanitarian donation of $700 by the Social Justice Centre of UBC (SJC) to the Canadian Boat to Gaza, a project trying to lift the crippling Israeli siege against the 1.5 million Palestinians. The Israeli blockade goes on in spite of a recent call by 21 international human rights organizations calling for an immediate end to the Gaza siege (7). In contrast to IAC’s self-serving action, Palestinian fire fighters recently participated in controlling the massive forest fire near Haifa as a humanitarian gesture. Meanwhile, at UBC, despite losing the vote on the donation at student council, Zionist intimidation and scare tactics continue, including an outlandish “terrorist” smear campaign, targeting students during the most stressful exam period. How low can you go?

• And most recently, in a new depth of abuse of legislative process, on December 7, 2010, some members of the Ontario Legislature condemned an MA thesis written by Jenny Peto, a granddaughter of a Holocaust survivor, entitled “The Victimhood of the Powerful: White Jews, Zionism and the Racism of Hegemonic Holocaust Education” (8). This was not the first time the Ontario Legislature came to the defence of Israel; earlier this year, some of the same MPPs led an attack on the student activity Israeli Apartheid Week held across the country(9). On Dec 8, 2010, the Toronto Star reported that “Ontario citizenship and immigration minister Eric Hoskins said that he was ‘greatly disturbed and in fact disgusted’… Hoskins was responding to Progressive Conservative MPP Steve Clark, who called the thesis ‘disgusting.’ PC MPP Peter Shurman, whose Thornhill riding includes a large Jewish population, said the thesis was a hateful, poorly researched ‘piece of garbage.’” (10) The National Post also quoted Shurman as saying “‘I’m not sure Ontario is an appropriate place for preaching hate.’ He hasn’t read the paper, but nonetheless owes it to his largely Jewish constituents to defend Israel on their behalf, he said.” (11) Mr. Shurman alleges to be concerned for the feelings of his Jewish constituents, but not the Jewish daughter of a holocaust survivor, simply because she is not a Zionist. It is interesting that this representative of the Ontario people feels free to pass academic and moral judgment on a university thesis without admittedly even reading the paper. It seems it is enough for him to get his marching orders from the Zionist establishment. Perhaps he also has a hotline to the Israeli ambassador, like other Canadian politicians!!

No wonder the Zionists and their (way more than three) stooges are going bust and bankrupt. CIJA is wasting more than 11 million dollars on advocacy for Israel and one million of it reportedly goes to Canadian campuses. Small wonder CIJA is “seeking to centralize control”. However, their re-branding and their three D’s will not change the facts on the ground; rather, their desperate attempts are based on three other D’s – Diversion, Distortion of the truth and the message and Defamation of the messenger, all of which are being exposed daily by people with common sense.
In 1896, Theodor Herzl wrote in his book “The Jewish State”: “In Palestine…we shall be for Europe a part of the wall against Asia, we shall serve as a vanguard of civilization against barbarism.” After 114 years, it seems many in the Canadian main stream media and all levels of government still believe in the supremacist ideology of Zionist settler colonialism.
On Dec. 12, 2010, Jonathan Kay wrote in the National Post under the title: “Jonathan Kay: The Jenny Peto scandal shows that it’s time to clean house at OISE”, and demanded that the University of Toronto’s teacher’s college (OISE) be cleansed from any anti-Israel criticism. He stated: “Surely, the higher-ups at UToronto know about this sort of thing. Will the Peto scandal give them the excuse they need to clean house?” (12) We ask the people of Canada: Isn’t it now the time to clean house in the main stream media, provincial and federal government offices from those whose main concern is self-interest and the interest of a foreign government, and not the interest of the Canadian people?

We are certain that the Palestinian people will finally enjoy equality, justice, peace and dignity.

(1) http://www.cjnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20362&Itemid=86
(2) http://cija.ca/en/
(3) http://www.cjc.ca/2010/06/11/cjc-response-to-kairos-palestines-policy-paper-a-moment-of-truth/
(4) http://www.kairospalestine.ps/sites/default/Documents/English.pdf
(5) http://www.jcpa.org/phas/phas-sharansky-f04.htm
(6) http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=3776
(7) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11868589 or http://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/OPT_Gaza-paper_2010-11-30_EN_OK.pdf
(8) http://hdl.handle.net/1807/24619 or https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/24619/1/Peto_Jennifer_201006_MA_thesis.pdf
(9) https://cpavancouver.org/Dinovo.doc , https://cpavancouver.org/response%20to%20Shurman.doc , https://cpavancouver.org/Open%20Letter%20to%20Premier%20Dalton%20McGuinty%20and%20Ontario%20MPPs.doc
(10) http://www.thestar.com/news/article/903408–minister-slams-student-thesis-on-holocaust-education?bn=1
(11) http://www.nationalpost.com/news/Thesis+Jewish+privilege+rebuked+sparking/3949150/story.html#ixzz17szlJG4F
(12) http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/12/12/jonathan-kay-the-jenny-peto-scandal-shows-that-its-time-to-clean-house-at-oise/#ixzz17suLzBQ1

Letter From Kevin Neish to Mountain Equipment Coop (MEC)

The following letter was sent by Mavi Marmara survivor Kevin Neish to Mountain Equipment Coop (MEC). Please note that Kevin is not a member of the Canada Palestine Association but we are publishing his letter on our site on his behalf.

Dear MEC Board,

My name is Kevin Neish and I’m a MEC member. I was on board the humanitarian aid ship the Mavi Marmara when it was assaulted by Israeli commandos on May 31st 2010. I witnessed, or saw the evidence of, the Israeli military’s murder and execution of 9 fellow aid workers and wounding by gunfire 30 to 40 others. Myself and the other survivors suffered brutal humiliating treatment by the Israelis on the ship, in prison and during our deportation. Beatings, torture and abuse were commonplace. As a white Westerner I was safer than the Arab and Turkish aid workers but even I was threatened several times with beatings and I had a gun put to my head at least 6 times for daring to challenge the soldiers brutal treatment of fellow aid workers. I was not permitted to use a washroom for over 15 hours and was not allowed to sleep for 3 days, with prison guards apparently enjoying waking us up regularly all night long.

I was heading to Gaza to assist in repairing their water and sewer systems and to act as a human shield for school children. I had over $1000 of high quality MEC clothing and equipment in my luggage but the Israeli soldiers either stole or destroyed almost everything I had. I imagine that my new Contention Gore-Tex jacket and Keen Oregon boots are now wandering around Tel Aviv on some soldier.

It’s quite possible that some of MEC’s Israeli partner company’s equipment was in use by the commandos who attacked me on the Mavi. Perhaps some of those companies employees were the ones putting guns to my head and beating people around me.

I will not purchase one single item of equipment or clothing from MEC until you come to your senses and stop dealing with Israeli companies. They support Israel’s brutal military, oppress and exploit the Arab minority in Israel and support the illegal occupation and brutalisation of Palestine.

I would be more then willing to explain, document and prove what happened to me in person at any meeting of the MEC board or membership.

I look forward to your reply.

Kevin Neish