Month: April 2003

By Dr. Rafeh Hulays. The following letter was published in Vancouver’s Westender, in the April 24-30, 2003 issue, in response to “Taking issue with ISM activists”, letters published in the Westender (April 17-23, 2003 issue)

Alan Switzer’s venomous criticism of International Solidarity Movement (ISM) activists is a classic example of attacking the messenger. He would actually have us believe that those who put their lives at risk to protect Palestinian civilians victimized daily under Israel’s illegal military occupation are somehow anti-Semitic (an irony considering that Arabs are Semites) and advocates of the “final solution.” Switzer then attacks ISM members for bearing witness to Israel’s atrocities, but not those committed by China or despotic Arab regimes.

There is an essential difference between the two cases: among other countries with dismal human rights records, China and certain Arab states are regularly censured by North American media and lobby groups, whereas Israel, with its enormous influence, escapes virtually unscathed. Indeed, every year it receives billions of dollars in aid from the United States along with billions more in tax-deductible contributions.

Since 1948, Israel has expelled 1,250,000 Palestinians whose numbers have grown to nearly 8 million. After demolishing over 400 of their towns and villages, Israel has confiscated their lands for the exclusive use of Jews. What remains of Palestine is under cruel military occupation, making its towns and villages into prisons surrounded by Israeli forces, illegal settlements and bypass roads. Those who doubt the severity of the crimes committed against Palestinians need only refer to Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the International Red Cross, the United Nations, the U.S. State Department, and B’Tselem, the Israeli Human Rights organization.

ISM activists have been so effective in drawing attention to crimes against Palestinians that they are now targeted by the Israeli military. Several have been killed or wounded in the past few weeks. There can be no question as to the motives of Switzer and others who support ethnic cleansing of Palestinians along with occupation of their lands and gross violations of their human rights in attempting to defame the ISM.

We should all heed the words of Albert Einstein (displayed on every page of the ISM’s website: “The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”

ISM’s activists have taken these words to task by “struggling for freedom and resisting the (Israeli) occupation through non-violent direct action.” In the interest of all oppressed people, let us help them achieve their goal.

Rafeh Hulays, Ph.D.

By Hanna Kawas. The following letter was published in Vancouver’s Westender, in the April 24-30, 2003 issue, in response to “Taking issue with ISM activists”, letters published in the Westender (April 17-23, 2003 issue)

The Letters published in the Westender (April 17-23 issue), under the title “Taking issue with ISM activists”, are an attempt to divert attention away from the real issues at stake, one of which is Israeli warcrimes against the Palestinians (see Amnesty International report at www.amnesty.org, searchword: Israel). It is truly pathetic to see the extent to which the pro-Israeli apologists are willing to go to cover up the facts. Instead of dealing with answers to the Palestinian civilian suffering under Israeli occupation, they try to ridicule the genuine human feelings and the courageous stand of the Vancouverites who volunteered with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). They even deny that the occupied territories are indeed occupied. Israel’s closest ally, the U.S., considers the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem as “Occupied Territories.” The irrefutable basis for this is the hundreds of United Nations Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, and the Forth Geneva

Convention.

(Letter author) Mr. Steve Lipari quotes UN Security Council Resolution 242 as a proof that the Palestinian territories are not occupied lands. He states that the resolution calls for Israel to withdraw “from territories” and not from “all the territories”, conveniently forgetting to mention that the preamble of the same resolution de-legitimized any territorial conquest by “Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”. If any territory is “disputed” it is in fact the Israeli territories, for the following reasons:

1. Israel, since its creation in 1948, never defined its borders. Israel still does not have a constitution precisely so as not to define its borders, and thereby allow for more conquest of Arab and Palestinian lands;

2. In 1947 the UN Partition Plan which created Israel gave it 56 per cent of the area of historic Palestine. At that time, Jews-be they Palestinian natives or settlers-only owned six per cent of the total area of historic Palestine;

3. In 1948 Israel expanded its territories by military conquest and controlled 78 percent of the total area of historic Palestine;

4. The Jewish National Fund and its affiliates (which does not sell nor lease to non- Jews) controls 93 per cent of the land in Israel and most of this land was confiscated from the indigenous native Palestinians without their consent. So which territories are the “disputed territories”?

Hanna Kawas,
Chair, Canada Palestine Association