A session by the Canadian BDS Coalition and International BDS Allies. Speakers: Hanna Kawas, Canada Palestine Association, Bram Hanekom, Africa for Palestine, Bana Abu Zuluf, Good Shepherd Collective, Karen Rodman, Just Peace Advocates
Moderator: Sara Farhan, PhD
Month: January 2025
BDS Vancouver marks 10 years
BDS Vancouver-Coast Salish was formed 10 years ago, and has worked consistently since then to demand “No Business as Usual” with Israel and all those complicit in enabling Zionist oppression.
The group has launched and participated in many campaigns, from Stop G4S, to Boycott Air Canada, to calling out PUMA for sponsoring Israeli teams, to Boycott Israeli Wines and most recently calling on Scotiabank to divest from Elbit Systems.


Let’s Boycott Israel: Meeting Feb. 13
Join us for this important educational and strategy planning event on Thursday, February 13, 7 pm at 1803 E. 1st Ave., Vancouver as BDS Vancouver-Coast Salish marks its ten year anniversary.
Our panel will include presentations on multiple local campaigns from Shame on Scotiabank, to Boycott Indigo Books, to Ban Israeli Wines and more. This will be followed by break-out sessions for further discussion, as we work to build BDS Campaigns as one part of the strategy for the liberation of Palestine.
We hope to see you there!
The Vultures of Anti-Palestinianism
The Vultures of anti-Palestinianism:
What Not to Do When the Cops Come Calling!
The last 15 months have witnessed an inspiring increase in public support for Palestine; simultaneously, it has also been a time of ramped-up police repression especially in the imperial core.
Let’s look at the case of Vancouver, Canada that has been a target of particular interest to the Zionist lobby, partly because of the strong presence of Samidoun. For four years, CIJA and other pro-Israel groups pushed for the banning of Samidoun based on flimsy accusations with no evidence. Samidoun has always been a political advocacy group that defended Palestinian prisoners with education and mobilization, and the Canadian government designating them as “terrorist” in October 2024 set a new and dangerous precedent.
How did this come about, and what lessons can we learn from the Vancouver experience? How should the solidarity movement have responded to these challenges and what might be done differently in the future?
The first indication that the groundwork was actively being laid to ban Samidoun was the arrest of Charlotte Kates, their international coordinator, on a bus in Vancouver on April 29, 2024. She was charged on suspicion of “hate crimes” and released with stringent conditions. This was all based on her public comments of “Long Live Oct. 7” during a previous rally. Although no charges have been filed after eight months and counting, this did not stop the immediate vilification of Ms. Kates by the political and institutional establishment.
The pro-Palestine solidarity movement in Vancouver needed to respond forcefully to defend Kates, the right to protest and to free speech, and to show that such actions would be challenged. There were groups that spoke out quickly and decisively, including the BCCLA, but there were also some elements within the community and its supporters that wanted to take a “safer” approach.
This is not a new issue in the diaspora Palestinian community (or in most immigrant communities, for that matter). Do you take the risk of standing up against the huge forces of oppression lined up against you or do you think you should try to stay quiet and perhaps protect what little you have? Security and police forces are well aware of these contradictions and are very adept at manipulating and exploiting them to advantage; and no amount of appeasement or collaboration with the police will change that agenda.
These are not academic debates for marginalized people, but the decision by some to disassociate from Kates and Samidoun had negative repercussions. Repercussions that impacted everyone in the solidarity movement and that eventually contributed to the banning of a strictly political advocacy organization as “terrorist”.
After Kates’ first arrest in late April 2024, Samidoun continued to organize in the Vancouver area. There was increased police harassment of other protestors, most notably on May 31 at a rail blockade, and then the high-profile smear of a protest in July of the Israeli national softball team as “anti-Semitic”.
But it seems that the Zionist lobby, the Vancouver Police and others were not satisfied with these results…folks were still out on the streets vocally supporting Palestinian resistance and had not been cowed into disavowing Samidoun or others supporting the Palestinians’ legitimate right to resist. And we now know further plans were in the works, as evidenced by what happened on October 15 with the joint Canadian-US banning of Samidoun.
Although comments made at an October 7 rally were used as a pretext for the “terrorist” banning, it’s difficult to believe that two governments implementing the exact same action on the same day didn’t require weeks of high-level coordination. But the stage was set, public opinion was inflamed and the deed was done.
But even that wasn’t enough for the vultures of anti-Palestinianism, as two raids on the private residences of local activists have followed. The first one was a high-profile militarized VPD raid on Nov. 14, again on Charlotte Kates, this time at her home; and the second was another raid and arrest of other supporters. Both times, people were eventually released without charge.
So back to the original question, what are the lessons going forward for the pro-Palestine movement. Samidoun was pivotal in holding space within the movement for radical thought and action, at least in the Lower Mainland of BC. That was their main threat to the establishment, not any calls for “violence” or any “terrorist” fundraising. As such, everything that has been done so far by the VPD has failed, because there are still groups working to hold that space open as well
But the precedent of censoring political speech and the chill effect on the solidarity work must be recognized. People are afraid (understandably so) but has the “safer” approach still being promoted by certain elements achieved anything for the community? No, the exact opposite. In fact, this ambivalence was just what the Zionist lobby and the government were looking for, and only served to empower and embolden their repression.
Even for those that felt they had political differences with Samidoun, once people are arrested and targeted, it is our duty to close ranks and defend them. This is the only response that can and will stem the violent repression currently underway, both in Palestine and globally.
Slogans are not enough, we must be willing to put those words into action. The only reason the Palestinian struggle is still alive is because of the bravery of generations of its fighters during the last century. We cannot shy away now from honouring that proud legacy of Sumoud and resistance, the Palestinian people deserve our last breath of courage and strength. We fight until victory and liberation!
(by Marion Kawas, an activist and writer, and longtime member of Canada Palestine Association)
CBC is complicit in genocide!
CBC’s outgoing ombudsman, Jack Nagler, recently released a review entitled “A Divisive Phrase”. This review came about due to complaints over CBC’s repeated use of the term “Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry.”
His conclusion was similar to what we have seen before from his office. Yes, useage of the phrase in the incident cited was probably unnecessary but it “in no way violates CBC’s journalistic standards.” (More on those “standards” later)
This was the same approach Nagler used with our complaint back in 2021, when we challenged the on-air apology about the use of “Palestine” during an interview. This was when CBC’s infamous language guide received international exposure for its pro-Israel bias, a guide that states: So do not refer to Palestine or show a map with Palestine as a country. Use the term “pro-Palestinian” instead of “pro-Palestine” when referring in generic ways to Palestinian supporters.
This new review covers a complaint that is now almost one year old, going back to Jan. 11, 2024. As such, it gives us a unique opportunity to see how CBC’s framing of the health situation in Gaza helped lay the groundwork for Israel’s horrific destruction of Gaza’s entire medical infrastructure and the arrest and torture of doctors and other medical staff.
The repetition of such terminology has consequences and as the original complainants noted: “the addition of the “Hamas-led” qualifier is inherently pejorative in intent. It is also preposterous for reasons we have stated, showing direct bias against the integrity of the Gazan health authority. The “Hamas-run health ministry” is synonymous with ‘terrorist health ministry’.”
This imaging, this dehumanization of all Palestinians in Gaza as terrorists (even kids) is the foundation for what we have seen recently and are still witnessing at hospitals across Gaza…Kamal Adwan hospital, Indonesian hospital, AlAhli hospital and the list goes on. The cornerstone was laid for Western public opinion to accept these atrocities, although the response in recent days to the arrests and disappearance of Kamal Adwan’s staff and director has defied this racist narrative.
The CBC ombudsman concludes his rambling review with the following:
The point for consideration, then, is volume and frequency. I note that the phrase “Hamas-run” is used much less often in CBC’s reporting these days. I would encourage programmers to use it as sparingly as possible, and only when relevant to the story at hand.
But no, this is too little, too late. The damage has been done and the outcome is there for all to see. Gaza’s health care system will take generations to recover and that was really the Israeli objective from the beginning. An objective that CBC obligingly aided and is now still defending.
Which brings us back to CBC and its touted “journalistic standards”.
Don’t tell us your seasoned journalists and editors don’t understand the power of language and the role of media in perpetuating a specific narrative. Don’t expect us to believe that you don’t comprehend how the words you use will help facilitate a certain outcome…outcome of genocide, an outcome of the obliteration of Palestinian society in Gaza.
Your senior executives can repeat endlessly that they “reject the idea that CBC News is somehow…’cheerleading a Genocide’.” We know that CBC is complicit in genocide, and history has now proven that this is true beyond any doubt. These are your only journalistic standards, whether by intent or cowardice.
