Letter to the Editor of the Ottawa Citizen Regarding the “Haters’ Test”

In response to the Ottawa Citizen’s attack on NDP MP Libby Davies
By Hanna Kawas

The Ottawa Citizen “Haters’ test” http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Haters+test/3139300/story.html, published June 11, 2010 is misleading, lacking in historic facts and crudely apologizes for Israeli occupation and discrimination. I am going to burden you with some documentation and references the Ottawa Citizen editors did not want to bother with.

Before 1948, there was no state of Israel. It came about as many historians (Jewish and otherwise) have now recognized – on the tragedy of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine from its indigenous people, the Palestinians. (See: All That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948 by Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi http://www.palestine-studies.org/books.aspx?id=591&href=details and also The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Israeli historian Ilan Pappe http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/3041)

To say “Happily, virtually every major Jewish and Israeli leader has, over the years, come to accept in principle the idea of a Palestinian state” is simply dishonest. From day one, Israel was trying to prevent the establishment of any such state. “In fact, secret negotiations with the King (Abdullah of Jordan), involving Shiloah (Ben-Gurion’s chief advisor on intelligence), Moshe Dayan, and others in Ben-Gurion’s inner circle, resulted in a secret agreement, lubricated by bribes, that Abdullah would collude with Israel in order to ensure that the independent Palestinian state envisaged by the United Nations would never come into being.” (Dangerous Liaison: The Inside Story of the U.S.-Israeli Covert Relationship, Andrew and Leslie Cockburn, page 34.) And if any Israeli leader seriously wanted to accommodate such a state, the obvious question to counter your blatant propaganda is why successive Israeli leaderships have planted over half a million illegal settlers in the 22% of historic Palestine (complete with apartheid infrastructure) that is supposed to go to this phantom Palestinian state. No Israeli leader has ever embraced the concept of a Palestinian state that would be independent and sovereign and contiguous, something the Citizen editors seem to dismiss as trivial details.

To say that “Jewish nationhood, (is) a key aspect of Jewish identity for 5,000 years” is not only inaccurate but also against Judaism (see “Israeli Independence Day” by the Torah Faithful Jews http://www.nkusa.org/activities/Statements/20090429IID.cfm).

And the real “Hate Test” question we would ask the editors of the “Ottawa Citizen” is this … Do you believe in the equality of all humans in practice, not just in abstract words? Would you support equal rights for the twenty percent of Israeli citizens who are non-Jewish (one in five Israelis are Christians and Muslims) and insist that they should be treated equally? Would you call for the Israeli law of return to apply to all Israeli citizens and that all discrimination in land ownership, education, municipal allocations and freedom of association should end? If not, then the Citizen editors don’t believe in equality and that would explain why they are insisting on a theocratic and exclusive “Jewish state” in the 21st century that denies equal rights to certain citizens on the basis of their religion.

On May 11/1949, the U.N. General Assembly passed resolution 273(111) that admitted Israel as a state to the U.N. We should note that this resolution was co-sponsored by Canada.

The resolution stated: ” Recalling its resolution of 29 November 1947 (the Partition Plan) and 11 December 1948 (the Right of Return), and taking note of the declaration and explanation made by the representative of the government of Israel before the ad hoc Political committee in respect of the implementation (my emphasis) of the said resolutions the General Assembly … decides to admit Israel into the membership of the United Nations.”

However, to this day, Israel has not honoured either of these commitments made to the UN. In fact, since 1948 and in violation of UN Resolution 273(111), Israel continues to hold on to over 20% more of historic Palestine than what even the Partition Plan allotted to it, another “fact on the ground” accomplished by military force. This figure doesn’t even include the Palestinian territories occupied in 1967. Also, Israel adamantly and openly refuses to implement the Palestinian Right of Return.

Finally, even though its apologists continue to call Israel a democratic state, it is a state with no defined borders, no charter of rights for all its citizens and no constitution. And the editors of the Ottawa Citizen pontificate about “bad faith”.

What a mockery of truth, logic and decency the Ottawa Citizen is promoting!

Hanna Kawas
Chairperson, Canada Palestine Association

MP Irwin Cotler: “Canada remained (at Durban I) at the request of the Israeli government”

From a Facebook post on Dec. 4, 2009:

The loyalty war for Israel between the two main Canadian parties, the Conservatives and the Liberals, is heating up and in the process, exposing many facts. One of them is that Canada stayed at the Durban I conference not to further the anti racism agenda, but “at the request of the Israeli government” to further another country’s agenda in implementing apartheid, ethnic cleansing and war crimes against the Palestinian people.
And for the first time the Zionists seemed to have discovered that the Conservative Party policy “plays up dangerous stereotypes” and concretely promotes antisemitism against all Jews, Zionists or not (see below).

Hanna
————————————————————–
http://www.jewishindependent.ca/archives/Dec09/archives09Dec04-11.html

December 4, 2009
Get rid of 10-percenters
Editorial
A recent flyer sent out by Conservative members of Parliament, promoting their party’s Israel record at the expense of the Liberals, has put the Jewish community at the centre of controversy.
MPs are allowed to send – with free postage – flyers to up to 10 percent of the voters in a riding outside their own. These so-called “10-percenters” cost taxpayers about $10 million a year. Their benefits are less clear.
Liberal MP Dr. Carolyn Bennett apologized recently for her 10-percenter that attacked the Conservatives’ handling of the H1N1 (swine) flu among First Nations communities with the slogan “No vaccines, just body bags” and a picture of body bags and a sick aboriginal child. Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq chastised Bennett and told CBC, “First Nations communities should not be used as punching bags for a political party.”
Perhaps not to be outdone in the fear-mongering-among-vulnerable-minorities department, the Conservatives recently sent out a flyer to several Liberal ridings with large numbers of Jewish voters, including ones in Quebec, Toronto and Winnipeg.
On one side of the flyer asking which federal political leader “is on the right track to represent and defend the values of Canada’s Jewish community?” there are two columns, each with three points. On the left, the Conservatives: “Led the world in refusing participation in Durban II hate-fest against Israel”; “Insisted on banning Hezbollah and led the world in defunding Hamas-led Palestinian Authority”; “Strongly backed Israel’s right to self-defence against Hezbollah during 2006 conflict.” On the right, the Liberals: “Willingly participated in overtly anti-Semitic Durban I”; “Opposed defunding Hamas and asked that Hezbollah be delisted as a terrorist organization”; “Michael Ignatieff accused Israel of committing war crimes during 2006 conflict.”
It is true that the Conservatives have been unambiguously supportive of Israel and have strongly condemned anti-Semitism. Under Stephen Harper’s leadership, for example, Canada joined the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research. The Conservatives have spent millions on the Jewish community, as part of the security infrastructure pilot program (though B’nai Brith Canada (BBC) notes in its annual anti-Semitism report that the Liberals made a pre-election pledge of $75 million for a similar program, which BBC considered “clearly a more realistic figure” than the Conservatives’ $3 million) and the federal government will provide Lubavitch B.C. with $633,300 from the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund to renovate the Lubavitch Centre (the B.C. government and Lubavitch B.C. will each invest an identical amount).
Wouldn’t it have been nice to see a positive 10-percenter promoting these achievements? Instead, the recent flyer comes so close to mistruths that, as of Monday, House of Commons Speaker Peter Milliken ruled the flyer had breached the Parliamentary privileges of Liberal MP Irwin Cotler (to whose riding flyers were sent) and the House was set to vote on sending Cotler’s complaint to the Procedure and House Affairs Committee for an inquiry.
For example, it was the Liberal party that designated Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations in 2002, thereby making the financing of them illegal. While the Canadian delegation under the Liberals went “willingly” to Durban I, there was no indication that it would turn into the hate-fest it did and, according to Cotler, once it turned ugly, Canada remained at the request of the Israeli government. Finally, Ignatieff did accuse Israel of war crimes, though he did apologize and has since repeated his and his party’s strong support for Israel, calling in a speech to Canadian Jewish Congress for “all parties to be genuine defenders of Israel.”
Where does this leave us as Jews? Well, most of us were probably already familiar with the record of the Conservatives and Liberals on Israel. So what was the purpose of sending the flyer?
One of the results has been to bring to the national public stage divisions within the Jewish community. More than 100 Jews signed a letter of protest to the Harper government, supporting the Liberals’ record. Among the signatories was David Matas, senior legal counsel of BBC. Meanwhile, Frank Dimant, BBC chief executive officer, told the CBC that “he doesn’t interpret the pamphlets as accusing the Liberals of anti-Semitism. Rather, he said, they seem to accurately recount the fact that on several key issues, the Conservatives ‘were more in tune with the Jewish community’ than the Liberals.”
Even if that’s the case, one has to wonder at all the money and effort spent on the Jewish community, which makes up less than one percent of the Canadian population. The attention generates conflicting feelings. It feels great to have such strong supporters of Israel in Parliament, but so much attention to gaining Jewish votes (as if Jews are one-issue voters) could backfire, as it plays up dangerous stereotypes, not the least of which are that Jews control the world’s political institutions and that Jews have a double loyalty, first to Israel, second to their country of residence.
Such messaging, no matter how unintentional, should concern us. As should the messaging that a government doesn’t care about its First Nations citizens. As should any such propagandizing by any political party – especially with taxpayer dollars. Whatever the initial purpose of these 10-percenters was, it’s time to get rid of them.

Letter to the Editor of the Georgia Straight Regarding Israeli Wines

The following letter was sent to the Georgia Straight on Feb. 15, 2008.

It might interest your readers to know that the “new-generation Israeli wines” that Jurgen Gothe was promoting (Feb. 14/08) are literally fruit from the vines of Israeli occupation. We recently sent a letter to the BC Liquor Distribution Branch on this very subject which they have responded to claiming this matter is not under their “jurisdiction” and they offer products on a commercial demand basis. Here are some excerpts of our originial letter.

“The Golan Heights Winery (of which the Galil Winery is a joint venture) produces wines from grapes grown on occupied Arab land and some of their wineries are located on occupied Syrian land in the Golan Heights. All of this is in direct contravention of the Fourth Geneva Convention and stated Canadian laws http://www.dfait- maeci.gc.ca/middle_east/can_policy-en.asp#06 . To add insult to injury, you are displaying these products from occupied Arab territory under an Israeli banner, against all international norms and practices. There is a reason your suppliers insisted on having the Israeli banner used, an issue that has already caused problems for European liquor boards, particularly Sweden, and you may not be aware you are being used to advance an illegal occupation and annexation of the Golan Heights. The Israeli peace bloc Gush Shalom includes all the Golan Heights wines on their national boycott list of settlement products, under the heading “A Penny to the settlements is a Penny against Peace” http://gush-shalom.org.toibillboard.info/boycott_eng.htm.

Regrettably, your actions are rewarding Israeli occupation, ethnic cleansing and war crimes that are committed daily by the Israeli Government against the Palestinian and other Arab peoples. It is also offensive to people all over the world who are interested in peace with justice in the Middle East. Please consider our request to immediately stop carrying these Israeli wines, and do not repeat your historic mistake when you carried wines from the South African Apartheid regime.”

Unfortunately, the BCLDB and now your Jurgen Gothe (hopefully unknowingly) are aiding and abetting an illegal occupation and hindering the chances for any future genuine peace in the region.

Yours truly,
Hanna Kawas,
Chairperson Canada Palestine Association

__________________________________________________________________

The Georgia Straight edited and published only the following condensed version of our letter:

http://www.straight.com/article-133001/bitter-fruit-goes-into-israeli-wines

February 21, 2008

Bitter fruit goes into Israeli wines

It might interest your readers to know that the “new-generation Israeli wines” that Jurgen Gothe was promoting [“Israeli wines take a big, bold leap forward”, Feb. 14-21] are, literally, fruit from the vines of Israeli occupation. We recently sent a letter to the B.C. Liquor Distribution Branch on this very subject, which they have responded to, claiming this matter is not under their “jurisdiction” and that they offer products on a commercial- demand basis. Unfortunately, the BCLDB and, now, your Jurgen Gothe (hopefully unknowingly) are aiding and abetting an illegal occupation and hindering the chances for any future genuine peace in the region.

Hanna Kawas / Chairperson, Canada Palestine Association / New Westminster

CKNW: It is not Balance, it is Dishonesty‏

Israeli Ambassador given double time on Vancouver Radio Station‏

July 18, 2005

Peter Warren

Bill Good Show, CKNW

Dear Mr. Warren:

I wish to register my outrage at the way I was dealt with this morning on the Bill Good show. When I was contacted by your producer, I was told that the Israeli ambassador would be on from 9 – 9:30 am and then I would follow with another segment from 9:30 to 10:00 to give the Palestinian perspective.

I was horrified to discover when I came on the air at 9:30 that I was not to have a chance to give my answers to your questions in a dignified manner, as the ambassador had been allowed to do, but rather he was kept on and allowed to continually barge in and censor everything I was attempting to say. If this is your idea of presenting a Palestinian perspective, then you are either underhanded or ill-informed. You should have been honest with me as to the format of the program, and then allowed me to decide whether or not to participate based on that information. True balance would have meant either both the ambassador and I were on from 9 – 10 am with equal time and equal access to responding to the other, or we each had a separate half hour by ourselves with the interviewer and the public.

I will not accept any further invitations from your station, and will inform people in my community of what has happened. Furthermore, this message will be posted on our website, and if you feel you could defend your journalistic practices, we will post that for you on our website as well.

Hanna Kawas

Chairperson, Canada Palestine Association www.cpavancouver.org

Host, Voice of Palestine www.voiceofpalestine.ca
——————————–
CKNW Responce

Subject: RE: CKNW: It is not Balance, it is Dishonesty
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:26:50 -0700
From: ikoenigsfest@cknw.com
To: hkawas@msn.com
CC: tplasteras@cknw.com

Mr. Kawas,

Thank you for agreeing to be a guest on CKNW yesterday morning. CKNW was one of the very few media outlets in Vancouver that provided a Palestinian perspective to Ambassador Baker’s visit to the city. In reviewing yesterday’s show, I think you were provided several opportunities to present the Palestinian viewpoint and you challenged and disagreed with the Ambassador repeatedly.

Mr. Warren decided at the very last moment to allow for dialogue between yourself and the Ambassador in the hope that this would be of benefit to the our listeners. I think the spirited discussion helped to highlight the complexities in the region.

I apologize if there was any miscommunication in the invitation issued to you, it was certainly not intentional and it was definitely not underhanded or ill-informed. Live talk radio is spontaneous and interactive and Mr. Warren seized upon an excellent opportunity to foster a sharing of ideas.

Sincerely,

Ian Koenigsfest

Executive Producer

CKNW News-Talk/980

Letter to the Editor, The Globe and Mail

By Gary Keenan

Dear editor:

Barbara Hodgson’s excellent letter (More than a Memory, Oct. 8) regarding renowned British Arabist Gertrude Bell brings to mind the fact that the Middle East may well have been spared several decades of violence, death, and destruction if British Prime Minister Lloyd George had heeded her wise words regarding the 1917 Balfour Declaration.

While serving with British intelligence in Cairo, Ms. Bell advised the cabinet that “an independent Jewish Palestine” was impractical because “[Palestine]…is not Jewish;” the native population would not “accept Jewish authority…. Jerusalem, is equally sacred to three faiths, Jewish, Christian and Muslim, and should never, if it can be avoided, be put under the exclusive control of any one….” Yours sincerely,

Gary D. Keenan