Fateh Leadership Betrays the Memory of Abu Ammar and Abu Jihad

Bring Their Murderers to Justice

While the people all over the Arab world… Read more

Bring Their Murderers to Justice

While the people all over the Arab world are rising up against their U.S.-Israeli puppet regimes, the current Fateh leadership represented by the so-called Palestinian Authority (PA) is sending messages of support to these dictatorial regimes. The PA is also trying to prevent and suppress the Palestinian popular expression with the Tunisian and Egyptian uprising against these brutal dictatorships.

It is clear that this Palestinian leadership is serving US and Israeli interests and working against not only the Egyptian and Arab peoples’ aspirations but also against the liberation of the Palestinian people. Even the former Israeli Knesset member, Uri Avnery, figured it out when he stated: “The turmoil in Egypt was caused by economic factors: the rising cost of living, the poverty, the unemployment, the hopelessness of the educated young. But let there be no mistake: the underlying causes are far more profound. They can be summed up in one word: Palestine.”

Nonetheless, as recently exposed by the Palestine Papers(1), the present Fateh leadership is choosing to be on the side of the U.S. Empire and its allies, especially Israel, who are directly responsible for the war crimes against the Palestinian people. The PA is using the Egyptian regime’s tactics to suppress free speech; they are using “Dayton’s babies” (an elite PA security unit), that are financed by the U.S. and Canadian governments and trained by their intelligence services, in a desperate attempt to keep the Palestinian people chained.

This leadership is also betraying all the Palestinian martyrs especially Yasser Arafat (Abu Ammar) and Khalil Al-Wazir (Abu Jihad).

  1. Yasser Arafat: Over six years have passed since Arafat’s death, and the Fateh leadership has not pursued any serious attempt to expose the murder of Arafat. It has not asked the UN to investigate and expose his murderers, even though there have been signs from the beginning as to possible U.S.-Israeli complicity in his murder (see the article in COUNTERPUNCH “ The Revelations of Uri Dan”(2) “Dan claimed Sharon got approval from George Bush by phone early in 2004 to proceed with his plan after he told the US president he was no longer committed to “not” liquidating the Palestinian leader”.) There is a lot of evidence to support this view, including statements from his personal physician Ashraf al-Kurdi, Arafat’s former Cabinet secretary, Ahmad Abdel-Rahman, the former Fateh chairperson Farouq Qaddoumi (Abu Lutoff) and Bassam Abu Sharif, former senior advisor to Yasser Arafat. We tell Mahmoud Abbas and his Fateh leadership that silence on Arafat’s murder is complicity.
  2. Khalil Al-Wazir: Here is a chance for the Fateh leadership to demand justice for Abu Jihad and bring the former president of Tunisia, Zine El Abidin Ben Ali, one of the conspirators in his murder, to justice. But what does Mr. Abbas and his puppet regime do? He phones both Ben Ali and Mubarak to show solidarity with them. (For details of Ben Ali and his regime’s involvement in the murder of Abu Jihad, please see our letter(3) sent to the Tunisian Ambassador in Ottawa, or David Yallop’s book “To the Ends of the Earth” pages 224-226.)

On June 30, 2007 in our statement “What is Next for the Palestinian Secular Movement?(4)”, we warned of the dangers of the Abbas leadership regarding the Palestinian struggle and we called for his resignation.

We now call on:

  1. All the Palestinian people, and particularly Fateh members, cadres and leaders, to disassociate themselves from Abbas’ practices and policies and to topple him, and to declare loud and clear that Abbas does NOT represent the Palestinian people nor their cause.
  2. The UN to immediately appoint an objective tribunal to investigate the murder of Yasser Arafat headed by Richard Falk, U.N. Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights.
  3. The new Tunisian government to investigate the complicity of Ben Ali and his police and intelligence forces in the crime of murdering Abu Jihad, in addition to the many crimes they committed against the Tunisian people.
  4. All progressive forces to support the Tunisian, Egyptian, Palestinian, Yemeni and all other Arab peoples in their struggles for freedom, democracy and independence.

We demand justice for Abu Ammar and Abu Jihad and all the Palestinian and Arab Martyrs.


(1) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2011/1/23/introducing-the-palestine-papers
(2) https://www.counterpunch.org/2006/12/30/did-sharon-order-the-assassination-of-arafat/
(3) https://cpavancouver.org/2011/bring-ben-ali-and-his-police-and-intelligence-officers-to-justice/ 
(4) https://cpavancouver.org/2007/06/what-is-next-for-the-palestinian-secular-movement/  

Bring Ben Ali and his Police and Intelligence Officers to Justice

By Hanna Kawas. A letter to the Tunisian Ambassador to Canada regarding Read more

By Hanna Kawas. A letter to the Tunisian Ambassador to Canada regarding the Murder of Palestinian Leader Abu Jihad.

Tunisian Ambassador to Canada
Mouldi Sakri

Dear Ambassador:

We in the Canada Palestine Association, Vancouver, would like to request that your government charge the former president of Tunisia Zine El Abidin Ben Ali, his police and intelligence officers, with complicity in the murder of the beloved Palestinian leader Khalil El Wazir (Abu Jihad) in Tunis by an Israeli death squad on April 16, 1988. This is in addition to the long list of crimes he and his regime have committed against the Tunisian People.

David Yallop, the British investigative journalist, in his book “To the Ends of the Earth”, exposed the complicity of the U.S. and Tunisian governments in the murder of Abu Jihad.

Waiting to hear from you,
Sincerely Yours

Hanna Kawas
Chairperson, Canada Palestine Association


Following are some quotes from Yallop’s book (pages 224-226).

“When the Washington Post headlined its front page story on Jihad’s death with ‘High Backing Seen for Assassination’, it was absolutely correct but in view of the fact that it merely detailed the Israeli Cabinet decision to unleash its forces against Jihad, the Post got only part of the story.

The ‘High Backing’ also included the President of Tunis, Ben Ali, and the United States government, specifically the State Department.” Page 224

“On the night of April 15th, the American Cemetery close to the embassy was ablaze with light and activity. Normally in total darkness with a maximum of two Military Police patrolling, on this particular evening it was manned by thirty Military Police and a marine back-up. As part of the joint American/Israeli operation it had been agreed that the cemetery would serve as a fall-back position if the Israeli unit ran into heavy opposition.” Page 225

“Despite the fact that a neighbour to Jihad phoned the police at least twice, first to report the intruders, second to report hearing and seeing gun-fire in Jihad’s garden, the Tunisian police declined to send a car… By a curious coincidence on that evening virtually all members of the Tunisian police force had been taking part in a large exercise between nine in the evening and midnight. At midnight they had all been stood down and appear to have been on a mass collective meal break. The killing of Jihad took place at one-thirty in the morning. The Israeli unit were wearing Tunisian National Guard uniforms.” Pages 225-226

“The assassination of Jihad was not quite the flawless operation that the myth gives one to expect from the Israelis. The telephone jamming had failed and without the Tunisian complicity so would have the entire operation.”

“In the journey back to the Tunisian beach … one of the retreating units took a wrong turning and ripped the bottom out of the vehicle. Again without Tunisian connivance, the entire unit could so easily have been caught.” Page 226

Yallop concludes by saying “This, based on my research, is how the democratic nations of Israel and the United States, aided and abetted by Tunisia, disposed of the problem of Abu Jihad.” Page 226

CBC serves the interests of the Mubarak dictatorship?‏

By Hanna Kawas

The report today by Mark Kelley on CBC Newsworld (http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/1221258968/ID=1779295850Read more

By Hanna Kawas

The report today by Mark Kelley on CBC Newsworld (http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/1221258968/ID=1779295850) was misleading and serves the interests of the Mubarak dictatorship. No foreign journalist was threatened until yesterday when the “Mubarak thugs”, as CNN report Ben Wedeman called them, took to the streets and started attacking people. Even foreign governments, including our own, managed to grasp that it is Mubarak supporters who are trying to shut down the foreign media. But not Mark Kelley, who simply takes the word of a translator to form his analysis, and cannot tell if his attackers are the anti-regime protestors (who never attacked journalists in this manner for the last week) or Mubarak supporters. Perhaps its time we stopped parachuting in reporters who are woefully ignorant of the situation they are covering, do not speak the language (as does Ben Wedeman) and are prone to taking whatever official version is given to them.

Mark Kelley is not connecting, he might be already suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), please bring him back immediately for his own sanity and safety and so he doesn’t embarrass Canadians any further with his uninformed reporting on a very pivotal moment in Arab history.

Hanna Kawas
Co-Host, Voice of Palestine
Voice of the Palestinian people
Voice of the Arab people